Stay Of Removal

There are three kinds of removal order which can be issued to non-citizens residing in Canada, and each type of removal order carries with it separate consequences:

  1. Deportation Order
  2. Exclusion Order
  3. Departure Order

deportation order deems an individual “permanently barred” from Canada; they will be arrested by Canada by the Canada Border Service Agency and removed from Canada.  These individuals cannot return to Canada unless they apply for and get approval for an Authorization to Return to Canada (“ARC”). An exclusion order prevents an individual from returning to Canada within a specified period of time (usually 1 year, unless issued for misrepresentation in which case it would be 5 years).  If an individual wishes to enter Canada during the period of exclusion, they need to apply for and have an ARC approved. A departure order allows an individual to voluntarily leave Canada within 30 days after which it becomes a deportation order.

An individual can receive a removal order in a variety of circumstances. These include: asylum seekers who receive conditional removal orders when they make a claim, and if their claim is rejected, the removal order becomes enforceable; visitors who breach the conditions of or overstay a visa; permanent residents convicted of criminal offences; and failed permanent resident applicants who applied from inside Canada.

Permanent residents who have been issued a removal order have the option of appealing this decision to the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD), unless they have been found inadmissible on grounds of security, violating human or international rights, serious criminality or organized criminality. In some cases the order is neither allowed nor withdrawn, and instead is stayed. A stay suspends the enforcement of a removal order for a period of time and usually attaches case appropriate conditions. Typical conditions include:

  • Regular reporting to the CBSA
  • Not commit an offence under an Act of Parliament
  • Keeping the peace and good behaviour, and
  • Making reasonable efforts to seek and maintain full-time employment.

At the end of the court-specified period, the appeal of the removal order is re-evaluated at which point the appeal can be allowed, dismissed, or the stay can be extended.

A second way to obtain a stay of a removal order is through the Federal Court. Here, a motion is submitted to the court requesting an individual’s removal be temporarily suspended on specific grounds including: that the individual faces serious harm in the country of their citizenship, they are involved in an ongoing judicial process, or they have an application for permanent residence which has yet to be processed.

Don’t try to navigate this complicated process alone! Get help today.

Contact Us


What Our Clients Are Saying
Mark Rasmussen
2 weeks ago
I recently needed a consultation only with Bellissimo Immigration Law Group. They were punctual and quite insightful as to my situation and thorough. I never felt rushed and also had a second colleague of theirs enter the consultation to confirm everything we had discussed. I will iuse them in the future. Spectacular.
Canadian Greeb
3 months ago
Nice law firm Very nice staff Slowly but surely
Carol
3 months ago
I had a truly excellent experience with Bellissimo Immigration Law Group. Keely is knowledgeable, warm, and incredibly detail-oriented, and Mario brings a wealth of experience and insight. I was helping my son’s nanny navigate a very complex immigration situation. She had been living with us in Canada for three years when we began her permanent residency application. During the process, we discovered an issue with her original work permit application. While it was an honest mistake, we knew it could have serious implications and wanted to handle it carefully. We consulted several immigration lawyers, and most advised that it would be a difficult case. Many suggested submitting an explanation and hoping for the best. The Bellissimo team also acknowledged the challenges but recommended a different approach — applying on Humanitarian and Compassionate (H&C) grounds. Mario had experience with this path and believed it would give us a stronger chance of success. The application process was thorough and required a significant amount of work. Keely guided us every step of the way. In total, we submitted over 80 supporting documents, many beyond the basic requirements, to fully demonstrate our nanny’s life in Canada and her contributions to our family and community. Keely and Mario also prepared a comprehensive submission that tied everything together clearly and persuasively. Due to COVID backlogs and changes in immigration policies, the process took several years. Throughout that time, the Bellissimo team continued to check in and monitor our file — they truly don’t just submit and walk away, which we really appreciated. We are so happy to share that our nanny has now received her permanent residency. Looking back, I am convinced that their strategy, attention to detail, and dedication made all the difference. I would highly recommend Bellissimo Immigration Law Group, especially for anyone dealing with complex or non-straightforward immigration cases.
Amanda Suckra
5 months ago
​"When our spousal sponsorship was denied due to a large age gap, we felt judged and defeated. Bellissimo Law Group changed everything. Alexandra Goncharova and her team are absolute experts in these sensitive cases; they didn't just provide legal advice—they gave us our future back. ​Alexandra was meticulous, fearless, and prepared us so thoroughly that our refusal was successfully overturned. If you are facing a complex appeal where the odds seem stacked against you, Bellissimo is the firm you need, Highest recommendation!"